Institutionalization of the EU policy coordination system – case of Poland.

Authors

  • R. Mieńkowska-Norkiene University of Warsaw

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31558/2307-2318.2019.4.22

Keywords:

coordination of the EU policies, Europeanization, public administration, institutionalization, European policy, EU multi-level governance

Abstract

The article is an analysis of the Polish European policy coordination system and its planned changes regarding both its institutional structure as well as its current legal and institutional development. The analysis is supported by an elaboration on the European Union’s (EU’s) general matters coordination system as one of the most important aspects of the Europeanization of EU Member States (MS). The central thesis of this article proposes that the Polish coordination system is not based on a single, clear model (although it has been influenced by certain solutions applied in different models), but rather it is inconsistent, stretched between ambitions to include European issues in the daily operations of public administration institutions and the tendency to treat European issues as a political tool. The models of coordination are briefly presented in the article. The level of efficiency of European policy coordination in Poland is briefly characterized in the article mainly considering the Metcalfe scale and the World Bank benchmarks. The article also indicates Poland's coalition potential in voting in the European Council.

The current system of co-ordination in Poland (set up by the reform of 2009) is based on dual center, namely on Committee for European Affairs, located in the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) and reporting to the PM as well as on Minister of Foreign Affairs (MFA). The reform of 2009 was necessary to efficiently prepare the Polish Presidency in the Council of the European Union (2011). In the system decentralization is steadily challenged by the tendency to centralize, sectoral ministries have relatively large autonomy, but are nevertheless steadily challenged by the MFA, PM, the minister responsible for European affairs (yet with weak political power as a deputy minister in MFA), finally (since 2015) by strong political leader of PiS.

The Polish coordination system is planned to be replaced by one main center in the PMO, with the MFA providing a supporting role. The strong influence of the PM in EU coordination models usually leads to centralization and better efficiency of representing policy preferences at the European level. In comparison, systems lead by the MFA are more efficient in implementing EU policies. Law and Justice – the Polish ruling party (PiS) - is planning to shift the center of the coordination system to the PMO for the purpose of centralization and easier control by the Prime Minister (or, as many analysts state, by the leader of PiS), as well as to make it more efficient. This is related not only to the fact that the position of the MFA in Poland is recently rather weak and of the PM quite strong but also to the fact that Poland has been involved in numerous conflicts with the EU institutions over the question of rule of law, which has increased necessity of involvement of politics into Poland-EU relations. However, the planned reform may deprive professional and highly-skilled public administration employees of influence on this process. It can also undermine the Polish participation in the multi-level activities of EU institutions, impeding the Europeanization. Taking into consideration the fact that Polish EU policy is rather reactive, centralizing the system and making it more politicized can bring clearer, better-grounded and stronger voice regarding Polish policy preferences in the EU. However, it can also make this voice more radically nationally-oriented than ever before.

Author Biography

R. Mieńkowska-Norkiene, University of Warsaw

Department of European Union Policies, Faculty of Political
Science and International Relations,

References

Barcz J., Unia Europejska wobe niepraworządnego państwa członkowskiego, Państwo i Prawo 2019, No 1

COREPER solutions for candidate countries, Doc. 14303/02, Elarg 373 of 15 November 2002 r.

Czachór Z., Jaskulski A., Jańczak J., Mieńkowska-Norkiene R., Tosiek P., Polish European Policy 2004-2014 Ideas, Aims and Actors, Berlin 2019

Derlien H.-U., Germany. In: Kassim H., Peters G., Wright V., The National Co-ordination of EU Policy Volume 2 The Domestic Level, Oxford 2001

Dunaj B., Popularny słownik języka polskiego (Polish Popular Dictionary), Warsaw 2000 EU-8 Public Administration Reform and Capacity in the EU-8 Poland. Background Paper September 2006, Report Number: 36930-GLB

Goetz K. (2001), Making sense of post-communist central administration: modernization, Europeanization or Latinization?, Journal of European Public Policy 8:6 December

Héritier A., Differencial Europe: National Administrative Responses to Community Policy. In: Cowles M., Caporaso J., Risse T. (ed.), Transforming Europe: Europeization and Domestic Change, New York 2001. https://www.votewatch.eu/blog/polish-approach-weakens-v4s-leverage-to-influence-thefuture-of-europe/; accessed 12 December 2019

Jacobsson B., Lægreid P., Pedersen O., Europeanization and Transnational States Comparing Nordic central governments, New York (Routledge) 2004

Jakubek J., Czy istnieje polski model koordynacji polityk unijnych? (Is there a Polish model of the EU policies coordination?). In R. Mieńkowska-Norkienė, R. (ed.), Koordynacja polityk unijnych w Polsce (Coordination of the EU policies in Poland), Warsaw 2009

Judgment of the Court of 12 January 1994. Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic. Case C-296/92

Kassim H., Meeting the Demands of EU Membership: The Europeanization of the National Administrative Systems. In: Featherstone K., Radaelli C. M. (ed.) The Politics of Europeanization, Oxford 2003

Maniokas K., Lithuanian European Policy and its Co-ordination. In: Vilpišauskas R., Maniokas K., Žeruolis D., Unification of Europe and Lithuania’s EU Accession Negotiation, Vilnius 2005

Metcalfe L., Trends in European Public Administration, Stockholm: Statsforvaltningens Internationalisering 1993 234 Економiка i орга

Michoński A., Nowak-Far A., Rola administracji rządowej w koordynacji polityki krajowej wobec Unii Europejskiej (Role of the government administration in coordination of the domestic policy towards the European Union), Służba Cywilna (Civil Service) No 6/2003, pp.7–36

Miecznikowska J., Unia Europejska a problem koordynacji polityk wspólnotowych – europeizacja administracji publicznej państw członkowskich (European Union and the problem of coordination of the EU policies – europeanization of public administration of the Member States). In: R. Mieńkowska-Norkienė R. (ed.), Koordynacja polityk unijnych w Polsce (Coordination of the EU policies in Poland), Warsaw 2009

Mieńkowska-Norkiene R., Efektywność koordynacji polityki europejskiej w Polsce. Model teoretyczny, ewaluacja i rekomendacje (Effectiveness of the coordination of European policy in Poland. Theoretical model, evaluation and recommendations), Warsaw 2013

Mieńkowska-Norkiene R., Efficiency of Coordination of European Policies at Domestic Level – Challenging Polish Coordination System, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 143, Elsevier 14 August 2014

Olsen J., Europeanization. In: Cini M. (ed.), European Union– organization and functioning, Warsaw 2007

Risse-Kappen T., Exploring the Nature of the Beast: International Relations Theory and Comparative Analysis Meet the European Union, Journal of Common Market Studies 34(1) 1996

Sulowski S., Państwo narodowe w procesie integracji europejskiej . In: Wojtaszczyk K. A. (ed.), Wstęp (Introduction), Integracja europejska (European Integration), Warsaw 2006

Tabaszewski R., Struktury koordynacji polityki europejskiej w Polsce (Structures of coordination of the European policy in Poland), Annales Universitatis Mariae CurieSkłodowska Lublin – Polonia VOL. XVIII, 1 SECTIO K 2011.

Downloads

Issue

Section

Articles