Interstate trade disputes as a manifestation of protectionism policy.

Authors

  • O. Yatsenko Київський національний економічний університет імені В. Гетьмана
  • D. Uskova Київський національний економічний університет імені В. Гетьмана

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31558/2307-2318.2019.4.6

Keywords:

international trade, trade dispute, international trade conflict, World Trade Organization, GATT, trade policy, import, export, Dispute Settlement Body, complainant, respondent

Abstract

The features of modern interstate trade disputes and their subject-object characteristics are investigated. The emphasis is placed on the domination and identification of protectionist policies in the process of implementing the policy of protecting national markets for goods, services, intellectual property objects from foreign competition, and forms of manifestation of non-protectionist actions are defined. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of WTO trade disputes has been carried out; in particular, the basic tools of the most active Member States as a plaintiff and defendant are analyzed. It was determined that the most conflicts occurred between the US and the EU, the US and China, between China and the EU. Methods and instruments for introducing trade conflicts between the above-mentioned countries are systematized, including direct and covert protectionism, imposing their own standards, abuse of WTO anti-dumping measures, export restrictions, and abuse of phytosanitary standards. The main determinants of the most violent 21st century trade conflict between the United States and China regarding the import of steel and aluminum into the United States are analyzed. The causes of the confrontation, the chronological sequence of actions of the governments of the countries are studied, the possible results of the conflict are analyzed. It has been concluded that the effects of trade disputes are likely to cause a deterioration in the well-being of people around the world.

Author Biographies

O. Yatsenko, Київський національний економічний університет імені В. Гетьмана

доктор економічних наук, професор

D. Uskova, Київський національний економічний університет імені В. Гетьмана

магістр

References

Келічавий А. В. Політика протекціонізму як фактор підвищення конкурентоспроможності економіки. Ефективна економіка. 2014. № 6. URL: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=3133.

Перелік торговельних конфліктів в рамках СОТ у період з 1995 р. по теперішній час 2019 р.: URL: https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/dispu_settl_1995_2018_e.pdf.

Серпухов М. Прихований протекціонізм як інструмент сучасної міжнародної торгівельної політики. Економіка розвитку. 2013. № 4 (68). С. 23-27.

Fixing America’s Broken Trade Laws: Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962: USA, May 22 2019. URL: https://www.heritage.org/trade/report/fixing-americas-brokentrade-laws-section-232-the-trade-expansion-act-1962.

Ісаханова Н., Кривецька О.. Торговельні обмеження США проти імпорту сталі та алюмінію: реакція світу. Всеукраїнське щотижневе юридичне видання «Юридична Газета Online». 31 травня 2018 р. №21-22, с.623-624.

BBC News. US steel and aluminium imports face big tariffs, Trump says: USA, March 1, 2018. URL: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-43249614.

The Washington Post. 3 ways Trump’s steel and aluminum tariffs could backfire: USA, 2018. URL: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2018/03/01/3-ways-trumpssteel-and-aluminum-tariffs-could-backfire.

WTO official site. DS544: UnitedStates – Certain Measures on Steel and Aluminium Products. URL: https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds532_e.htm.

WTO official site. Угода про захисні заходи СОТ. Ст. 8.1. С. 276. https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/25-safeg.pdf.

ABC News. China impose new tariffs on US meat, wine and fruit in retaliation for Donald Trump's steel taxes: USA, April 2, 2018. URL: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-04- 02/china-imposing-new-tariffs-on-us-meat-fruit/9609786.

World Trade Organization. Report on G20 Trade Measures. 2019. URL: https://www.wto.org › english › news_e › news19_e.

USA Today. 'NAFTA lite': Trump and Democrats' trade deal is similar to pact president mocked as 'worst ever': USA, December 11, 2019. URL: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/12/11/usmca-trade-deal-mexico-canadastrikingly-similar-nafta/2635063001.

USA Today. U.S., Mexico and Canada ink new trade agreement, but final ratification remains big hurdle: USA, November, 13, 2018. URL: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/11/30/trade-u-s-mexico-and-canada-signrevised-trade-agreement/2151060002.

European Commission. EU adopts rebalancing measures in reaction to US steel and aluminium tariffs: EU, June 20. 2018. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_18_4220.

KPMG. EU reaction to U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminum: EU, May, 13, 2018. URL: https://home.kpmg/xx/en/home/insights/2018/05/tnf-eu-reaction-to-us-tariffs-on-steel-and aluminum.html

Кореновська С. Made for minds. Китай заявив про початок найбільшої торговельної війни. 2018. URL: https://p.dw.com/p/30v4i.

Нік Мартін. Made for minds. Трамп проти всіх: коли торговельний конфлікт стане торговельною війною? 2018. URL: https://p.dw.com/p/30vj3.

Irwin, Douglas A. «The GATT in Historical Perspective». American Economic Review. Vol. 85, No. 2, pp. 323–328. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2117941?seq=1.

Issue

Section

Articles