Methodological bases of functioning of innovation-active environments collaborative value creation.

Authors

  • K.S. Bezgin Донецкий национальный университет имени Васыля Стуса

Keywords:

autopoiesis, aksiogenesis, collaboration, co-evolution, proliferation, polysubject, value

Abstract

Non-linearity of the flow of innovative processes radically changes the approach to the management of innovation aksiogenesis that involves finding other epistemological optics for their research and management. The prototype of the formation of the methodological grounds of functioning of innovation active polysubject media made the concept of autopoiesis, which reveals the effective mechanisms for the implementation of innovative activities, and the place of congruent shapes their realization brings paradigm polysubject and collaborations. In this paper by using abductive method conducted systematic comparison of the ontological essence of innovation-active media polysubject collaborative value creation and autopoiesis unities, as a result, identified the key areas of their coherence. Sequential selection of characteristics of open polysubject aksiogenesis necessitating comparison with its universally applicable antipode - a closed process of creating innovative value. Identified in an article the limited capacity of creating consonance object values within aksiogenesis closed, caused a range of socio-economic transformations, a multiple increase complexity and uncertainty of market processes. Under these conditions, the practical organization of congruent form of innovation activity are innovation-active environment collaborative value creation.

Author Biography

K.S. Bezgin, Донецкий национальный университет имени Васыля Стуса

д.э.н., профессор кафедры менеджмента

References

Безгин К.С. Управление процессом создания ценности на предприятии: полисубъектность и коллаборация: монография. – Харьков: «НТМТ», 2015. – 288 с.

Витакер Р. Обзор основных понятий автопоэзиса / Р. Витакер. – Пер. Р. Червоткина. – Режим доступа: http://synergetic.ru/autopoiesis/obzor.hlml.

Луман Н. Медиакоммуникации. – Пер. с нем. – М. : Логос, 2005. – 327 с.

Матурана У. Древо познания: биологические корни человеческого понимания. – Пер. с англ. – М.: Прогресс-Традиция, 2001. – 223 с.

Maturana H. R. Biology of language: The epistemology of reality / H. R. Maturana // Psychology and Biology. – 1978. – № 2. – Р. 27-63.

Maturana H. R. Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living / H. Maturana, F. Varela. – Boston: D. Reidel Publishing, 1981. – 143 р.

Maturana H. R. Autopoiesis / Autopoiesis: A theory of living organization // Psychology and Biology. – 1981. – № 2. – Р. 21-33.

Mowery D. C. Technological Overlap and Interfirm Cooperation : Implications for the Resource-based View of the Firm / D. C. Mowery, J. E. Oxley, B. S. Silverman // Research Policy. – 1998. – № 27. – P. 507-523.

Spencer-Brown G. Laws of Form. – New York: Dutton, 1979 – 142 p

Issue

Section

Articles