Determinants for forming the country's competitive policy.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31558/2307-2318.2018.3.1Keywords:
competition policy, abuse of dominant position, market power, dominant position, monopolization, price discrimination, refusal of the transaction, boycott, vertical agreementsAbstract
The article considers the formation of theoretical and methodological approaches to the study of the main determinants of the countries' competitive policy. The authors proposed the systematization of criteria for identifying situations of abuse of dominant position by monopoly firms. The methodical bases for the development of competition policy based on the definition of the objective of legal and economic protection of the market are substantiated.References
Уманців Ю.М. Механізм економічної політики: Навчальний посібник / Ю.М. Уманців, О.І. Міняйло, В.І. Косик. – Івано-Франківськ: Місто НВ, 2010. – 436 с
Ясько Ю.І. Оцінка стану механізму реалізації конкурентної політики в Україні // Lviv Polytechnic National University Institutional Repository http://ena.lp.edu.uaю – стор. 275-276
Autor, David, David Dorn, Lawrence F. Katz, Christina Patterson, and John Van Reenan. 2017. “The Fall of the Labor Share and the Rise of Superstar Firms.” NBER Working Paper No. 23396. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
BOSCHECK, Ralf (1994). "Competitive Advantage: Superior Offer or Unfair Dominance?," California Management Review, vol. 37, no. 1, Fall, pp. 132-151.
BUREAU OF COMPETITION POLICY, CANADA (1991). Reference Document on Abuse of Dominance, preliminary draft, 23 October.
COMPETITION AUTHORITY, IRELAND (1995). Interim Report of Study on the Newspaper Industry.
HOVENKAMP, Herbert (1986). Antitrust, Black Letter Series, West Publishing Co.: St. Paul, MN.
KATZ, Michael (1987). The Welfare Effects of Third-Degree Price Discrimination in Intermediate Goods Markets, American Economic Review, vol. 77 no. 1, March, pp 154-167.
KATZ, Michael (1989). "Vertical Contractual Relations" in Handbook of Industrial Organisation, vol. 1, R. Schmalensee and R.D. Willig, eds. Elsevier Science Publishing: Amsterdam. KAUPER, Thomas E. (1991) "Article 86, Excessive Prices, and Refusals to Deal," Antitrust Law Journal, vol. 59, pp. 441-456.
OECD, (1996). Abuse of Dominance and Monopolisation, OCDE/GD(96)131
OECD, (1994). Trade and Competition Policies, OCDE/GD(94)63.
OECD, Competition policy, www.oecd.org/daf/competition/.
OECD (2014), Competition and macroeconomic outcomes factsheet, www.oecd.org/daf/competition/factsheetmacroeconomics-competition.htm.
OECD (2001), Recommendation concerning Structural Separation in Regulated Industries, www. oecd.org/daf/competition/recommendationconcerningstructuralseparationinregulatedindustries.htm.
OECD, Competition Assessment Toolkit, www.oecd.org/daf/competition/assessment-toolkit.htm.
OECD, Country reviews of competition policy frameworks, www.oecd.org/daf/competition/countryreviewsof/competitionpolicyframeworks.htm.
OECD, Fighting bid rigging in public procurement, www.oecd.org/daf/competition/fightingbid rigginginpublic/procurement.htm.
OECD, (2018). Market Concentration - Note by Jason Furman, DAF/COMP/WD(2018)67
OECD, Pro-competitive Policy Reforms, www.oecd.org/daf/competition/reforms/
ORDOVER, Janusz A. and SALONER, Garth (1989). “Predation, Monopolization, and Antitrust” in Handbook of Industrial Organisation, vol. 1, R. Schmalensee and R.D. Willig, eds. Elsevier Science Publishing: Amsterdam.
Smith A. AN INQUIRY INTO THE NATURE AND CAUSES OF THE WEALTH OF NATIONS. - The Pennsylvania State University. – 2005. – 786 p.
VARIAN, Hal R. (1989). "Price Discrimination" in Handbook of Industrial Organisation, vol. 1, R. Schmalensee and R.D. Willig, eds. Elsevier Science Publishing: Amsterdam.
WHISH, Richard and SUFRIN, Brenda (1993). Competition Law, 2nd ed., Butterworths: London.
