Ukraine's debt policy in the context of economic security

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31558/2307-2318.2026.1.13

Keywords:

debt policy, debt risks, public debt, economic security, debt sustainability, debt management

Abstract

Among the numerous factors determining Ukraine’s economic security, debt risks occupy a central position. The cumulative nature of public debt, accompanied by the intensification of its negative effects, requires decisive, flexible, and adequate government actions. This creates an objective need to study the dominant features of modern debt policy in order to identify its gaps and substantiate directions for improvement. Trends in global debt markets exacerbate the negative dynamics of Ukraine’s debt problems. Therefore, the rethinking of debt policy in the context of minimizing its adverse impact on economic security is a relevant and timely area of scientific research.
The purpose of the study is to assess the dominant features of debt policy within the framework of ensuring Ukraine’s economic security.
The foundation of this research is a statistical database compiled from official data provided by Ukrainian government agencies, as well as international financial institutions and rating agencies. A wide range of general scientific and specialized research methods was applied, with particular emphasis on the modelling method, which was used to develop a debt security indicator that integrates macroeconomic, currency, and fiscal risks.
The study demonstrates the presence of negative effects associated with the growing public debt and related issues, including significant pressure on the state budget, currency risks, increased debt dependence, and a decline in the investment attractiveness of government debt instruments. Identifying the distinctive features of Ukraine’s current debt policy allowed for an assessment of its effectiveness and the tracing of cause-and-effect relationships between debt and economic security. Key characteristics of Ukraine’s debt policy include exceeding fiscal capacities, surpassing solvency limits in planning and executing public borrowing, increasing the share of external loans and grants, temporarily disregarding scientifically justified debt safety thresholds, restructuring existing obligations, and seeking creditor agreements when scheduled payments cannot be met. Evaluating each of these aspects revealed threats to economic security, which underscores the need to rethink debt policy using the proposed quantitative models.
The study found that Ukraine’s debt policy significantly affects economic security and financial stability. In 2020-2024, rising budget deficits and public debt, dependence on external borrowing, and currency risks increased the economy’s vulnerability. A transformation of debt policy is necessary to reduce debt burden, improve the efficiency of public borrowing management, and decrease foreign currency debt. Further research should focus on enhancing methods for assessing debt risks and modelling their impact on economic security.

Author Biographies

Yu. Verheliuk, State Tax University, Irpin, Ukraine

PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Financial Markets and Technologies

I. Guzhva, State Scientific Research Institute for Informatization and Economic Modeling, Kyiv, Ukraine

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Acting Director

M. Hantsiak, State Scientific Research Institute for Informatization and Economic Modeling, Kyiv, Ukraine

PhD, Acting Head of the Financial Policy Department

References

Bohdan, T. P. (2013). Borhova polityka derzhavy v umovakh hlobalnoi nestabilnosti [Debt Policy of the State under Conditions of Global Instability]. Ekonomika Ukrainy, 2, 4–17. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/EkUk_2013_2_2 [in Ukrainian].

Marshalok, T. (2025). Analysis of financial stability through the lens of Ukraine’s domestic debt policy. Inclusive Economics, 2(08), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.32782/inclusive_economics.8-8

Natsionalna stratehiia dokhodiv do 2030 roku: rozporiadzhennia KMU vid 27 hrudnia 2023 roku № 1218-r [National Income Strategy until 2030: CMU Resolution No. 1218-r of December 27, 2023]. https://mof.gov.ua/uk/national_income_strategy-716 [in Ukrainian].

Derzhavnyi veb portal biudzhetu dlia hromadian [State Budget Web Portal for Citizens]. https://openbudget.gov.ua/ [in Ukrainian].

Derzhavnyi borh ta harantovanyi derzhavoiu borh. Ministerstvo finansiv Ukrainy [State and State-Guaranteed Debt. Ministry of Finance of Ukraine]. https://mof.gov.ua/uk/derzhavnij-borg-ta-garantovanij-derzhavju-borg [in Ukrainian].

S&P Global Ratings. (2025). Research update: Ukraine issue rating lowered to 'D'; 'SD' FC ratings and 'CCC+/C' LC ratings affirmed; LC outlook stable. https://www.spglobal.com/ratings/en/regulatory/article/-/view/sourceId/13500920

Finansuvannia derzhavnoho biudzhetu Ukrainy z pochatku povnomashtabnoi viiny [Financing of Ukraine’s State Budget since the Beginning of the Full-Scale War]. Ministerstvo finansiv Ukrainy. 2025. https://mof.gov.ua/uk/news/ukraines_state_budget_financing_since_the_beginning_of_the_full-scale_war-3435 [in Ukrainian].

Urakin, M. (2024). Kontseptualni vizii derzhavnoho rehuliuvannia borhovoi polityky [Conceptual Visions of State Regulation of Debt Policy]. Problemy suchasnykh transformatsii. Seriia: Ekonomika ta upravlinnia, 16. https://doi.org/10.54929/2786-5738-2024-16-03-01 [in Ukrainian].

OECD. (2025). Global debt report 2025. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/global-debt-report-2025_8ee42b13-en.html

Razinkova, M., Grynko, T., Nebaba, N., Botvinov, R., & Pryimachenko, D. (2024). Patterns and trends in research on external public debt management. Public and Municipal Finance, 13(1), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.21511/pmf.13(1).2024.02

General government gross debt. https://countryeconomy.com/national-debt

El Mehdi, C., & Noufail Outmane, S. (2025). Perceptions of public debt management offices on the impact of public debt on economic growth in low and middle-income countries. Ekonomika, 104(1), 70–87. https://doi.org/10.15388/Ekon.2025.104.1.4

Prohrama upravlinnia derzhavnym borhom na 2025 rik [Public Debt Management Program for 2025]. Ministerstvo finansiv Ukrainy. https://mof.gov.ua/storage/files/Програма%20управління%20державним%20боргом%20на%202025%20рік.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Verhelyuk, Y., & Hantsiak, M. (2025). Diialnist bankiv Ukrainy na rynku OVDP yak chynnyk finansovo-intermediatsiinoho paradoksu [Activities of Ukrainian banks in the government bond market as a factor in the financial intermediation paradox]. Problems of Economy, 1, 288-295. https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-0712-2025-1-288-295 [in Ukrainian]

Ferreira Lima, K. (2024). Monetary power and vulnerability to sovereign debt crises: Rethinking the global financial architecture. Working Paper No. 1068. Levy Economics Institute of Bard College, Annandale-on-Hudson, NY. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5135340

International Monetary Fund. (n.d.). General government gross debt for Turkey Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/GGGDTATRA188N

Downloads

Published

2026-03-09

How to Cite

[1]
Verheliuk, Y., Guzhva, I. and Hantsiak, M. 2026. Ukraine’s debt policy in the context of economic security. Economiсs and organization of management. (Mar. 2026), 152-163. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31558/2307-2318.2026.1.13.

Issue

Section

Articles